Commercial and editorial metadata are not two styles of the same thing. Commercial rules tell you to describe the scene and keep real names and trademarks out of it. Editorial rules require you to name the person, the place and the date, in a fixed dateline, and to be factually exact. The same photograph submitted both ways needs two different metadata sets.
The two rule sets point in opposite directions
This is the part contributors underestimate. It is not that editorial metadata is stricter — it is that the two sets of rules forbid each other's content. Adobe Stock tells contributors not to refer to intellectual property, artist names or real people in titles, and to keep trademarks, brand names and personal information out of keywords. An editorial caption, meanwhile, is largely made of exactly those things: a named person, a named place, a dated event. The licensing difference between editorial and commercial work is what drives the split, and the metadata follows it.
So the practical failure is not sloppiness. It is applying the wrong template. A commercial submission with a dateline and a named celebrity gets refused for referring to a real person. An editorial submission written like a commercial title — "young woman smiling at a public event" — gets refused for not following the editorial format, because it tells a picture editor nothing verifiable.
Commercial metadata: describe, do not identify
Shutterstock's title rule for commercial content is specific and testable: English, a complete descriptive sentence of at least five words, accurately describing everything in the image or clip, with no special characters, and not a set of single words separated by commas. That last clause exists because a comma-separated title reads as a keyword list, and a keyword list used as a title is itself listed as a rejection cause. Repeated words or phrases in keywords are another, since search works from a single entry and does not reward repetition. The full Shutterstock keywording rules go into the rest.
Adobe's commercial side is quantified. Up to 49 keywords per submission, with the first 10 positions carrying the greatest influence on search ranking, each keyword used only once, all of them in a single language matching your contributor account. Titles are kept brief and clear, ideally under 70 characters, focused on what is visually most important, and free of gear-heavy or overly technical terms. Irrelevant keywords can lead to refusal outright, which is the mechanism behind most keyword-related Adobe refusals.
Check a commercial title and keyword set
Tests a commercial title and keyword list against the published rules: Shutterstock wants a complete English sentence of at least five words with no special characters and no comma-separated word lists, while Adobe Stock allows up to 49 keywords, counts the first 10 most heavily, expects each keyword once, and warns against trademarks, brand names and personal information.
Editorial metadata: identify, and be exact
Shutterstock's editorial caption opens with a dateline written in all capital letters, in the form of the city, then the state or country, then the month and day — followed by a factual description of what the image shows. Large, well-known cities stand alone without a country. If the date is unknown or does not apply, you supply as much as you can and replace the unknown part with CIRCA, in both the dateline and the description. The format is not a suggestion; a dateline in the wrong case or the wrong order is a formatting failure.
The first sentence after the dateline carries the real work. It describes what is happening using only factual information that directly describes the scene, in the active present tense, and it ends with the date followed by the location — "on [date] in [location]". If people are depicted, they are named and their actions described. Adjectives that interpret rather than observe have no place in it: "angrily" is a judgement, "raising a placard" is a fact.
A second sentence is optional and exists for one purpose: to explain why the image is newsworthy when the first sentence does not make that clear on its own. Shutterstock notes that photographs of famous landmarks or cities can qualify as editorial even without a specific event, provided you identify the news angle. That is the sentence where a general city view earns its place in an editorial collection rather than a commercial one.
Naming people has its own ladder. Sports and celebrity images must always name the person depicted — there is no "unidentified athlete" option. For human interest images where the subject's name genuinely cannot be obtained, the caption uses "unidentified", as in an unidentified woman selling vegetables. Children require more: name, age and general area of residence. Where that cannot be obtained and the photograph is particularly newsworthy, the caption may fall back to "an unidentified child", but only if the description stays factually accurate.
Commercial or editorial: which fields change
A field-by-field comparison from the published rules. Commercial titles are English sentences of five words or more with no real names, trademarks or special characters, and Adobe allows up to 49 keywords with the first 10 weighted most. Editorial captions need an all-caps CITY, STATE/COUNTRY dateline, active present tense, the date then location, named subjects, and a 200-character ceiling.
The 200-character ceiling changes how you write
Two hundred characters is roughly thirty words, and the dateline eats a chunk of it before you start. That constraint is why editorial captions read the way they do: no scene-setting, no adjectives, no second clause that repeats the first. Every word is either a fact a picture editor needs or it is cut. Contributors coming from commercial work tend to write 300 characters of careful description and then trim adjectives, which is the wrong order. Write the dateline, the who, the what, the date and the place, then add the news angle only if there is room and a reason.
What you may not do to an editorial file
Editorial rules reach past the metadata and into the pixels. Shutterstock prohibits digital alteration of editorial images: adding or removing elements, such as adding smoke at a protest or removing a distraction from the background, is not allowed. Slight scaling and cropping are acceptable, but the crop must not change the image's key elements or its message. Adobe frames the same principle differently — digital adjustments must be limited in scope and must not change the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. Both come to the same place: a retouching habit that is routine on commercial work will disqualify the identical frame as editorial.
Check who is even accepting editorial
Before you learn a caption format for a given platform, check that the platform wants editorial from you at all. Adobe's editorial requirements page currently states that individual contributors are not accepted for editorial submissions, and directs contributors to separate guidance for the Illustrative Editorial collection instead — a different thing, with its own rules. Gates like that move, and they move without announcement, so it is worth a look at the agency's own page rather than a round-up post before you build a workflow around it.
Adobe also sets conduct standards for editorial that have no commercial equivalent: content must be accurate, fair and thorough and must not misrepresent an event or its context; contributors must avoid conflicts of interest and must not accept gifts or favours in exchange for editorial content, nor conceal or misrepresent their purpose; captions, keywords, metadata and credits must be truthful, complete and accurate; and nothing may be libellous, slanderous or otherwise defamatory. These are not metadata fields, but they decide whether a caption is acceptable.
Keeping two metadata sets without mixing them
The mistake that costs the most time is treating editorial as a variant of a commercial record. It is a separate record for the same file, and the cheapest way to keep them apart is to decide the route before you write anything. Editorial route: collect the facts at the shoot — names, spellings, the exact date, the city and state or country, what the event was — because none of it can be reconstructed later from the pixels. Commercial route: describe the frame and strip identity out of it.
Mixed batches are where the leaks happen. One editorial caption copied into a commercial field puts a real name and a brand into a submission that forbids both, and one commercial title dropped onto an editorial file produces a caption with no dateline. If you shoot both in a day, separate the folders at ingest rather than at upload, because by upload time the only thing distinguishing the two sets is your memory of which was which.
Across several agencies the field names and limits differ even within the commercial route, which is the problem mapping your fields to each agency's requirements solves. Rastock AI writes titles, descriptions and keywords from the file itself and delivers to 10+ agencies over FTP and SFTP, applying each agency's own rules — banned and mandatory terms, field limits, keyword ordering — rather than copying one metadata set everywhere, with rollback if a batch goes out wrong. You can see what it does or start the 14-day free trial without a card. No revenue share, no ownership claim, IPTC and CSV export always open.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between editorial and commercial metadata?
Commercial metadata describes a scene without identifying anyone or anything specific: Adobe Stock tells contributors not to refer to intellectual property, artist names or real people in titles, and to avoid trademarks and brand names in keywords. Editorial metadata does the opposite. It requires the person, place and date to be stated factually, in a fixed caption format.
What is the Shutterstock editorial caption format?
A dateline in all capitals, in the form CITY, STATE/COUNTRY then the month and day, followed by a factual description of what is happening. The first sentence ends with the date and then the location. A second sentence is added only if the first does not explain why the image is newsworthy. The whole caption is limited to 200 characters.
How long can a commercial stock title be?
Shutterstock requires a commercial title to be a complete descriptive sentence of at least five words, in English, with no special characters, and not a list of single words separated by commas. Adobe Stock suggests keeping titles brief and clear, ideally under 70 characters. The two overlap in practice at roughly one well-built sentence.
How many keywords can I use on Adobe Stock?
Up to 49 keywords per submission. The first 10 positions carry the most weight in search ranking, so the most important terms go there. Each keyword is used only once, and all keywords are submitted in a single language matching the language set in your contributor account. Irrelevant keywords can cause refusal.
Can I crop or retouch an editorial image?
Only within strict limits. Shutterstock prohibits digital alteration of editorial images, including adding or removing elements such as smoke at a protest or a distracting object in the background. Slight scaling and cropping are acceptable, but the crop must not change the image's key elements or its message.
Can any contributor submit editorial content to Adobe Stock?
Not at present. Adobe's editorial requirements page states that individual contributors are currently not accepted for editorial submissions, and points to separate guidance for the Illustrative Editorial collection. That makes agency-by-agency checks necessary before you invest time in editorial captioning for a given platform.